A fire at a chemical plant is not a property claim. It is three claims fighting each other.
Structure, specialized equipment, and business interruption each settle on different rules, and the carrier's first number rarely reflects what it actually takes to make a process facility whole. We document and negotiate the full loss for the policyholder.
Start a claim review
Tell us what happened. A licensed Texas public adjuster will review the loss with you, and tell you straight whether you have a fight worth having. The review is free.
At a chemical facility the building is often the cheapest thing to replace. The real exposure is the process equipment, the interruption to continuous production, and the corrosive contamination that quietly condemns equipment in rooms the flames never reached.
The physical fire is usually the smallest part of the number.
On most commercial fires, the building is the loss. At a chemical or process facility, the building is often the cheapest thing to replace. The real exposure sits in three places that a standard field adjuster is not equipped to scope: the process equipment, the interruption to continuous production, and the contamination that spreads far beyond the burn area. Each of these is governed by different policy language, valued by different methods, and contested by the carrier in different ways.
That is why these claims are won or lost in the documentation, not the cleanup. A chemical plant claim that gets handled like a big house fire leaves enormous money on the table, because the person scoping it never accounts for custom-fabricated process units with year-long lead times, for the lost margin on production that cannot simply restart, or for the corrosive residue that quietly condemns equipment in rooms the flames never reached.
Process equipment and custom units
Reactors, distillation columns, heat exchangers, and control systems are frequently custom-fabricated with long replacement lead times. Their valuation, and whether the policy pays replacement cost or depreciated value, is one of the largest single fights in the claim.
Business interruption
A facility running a continuous process cannot just flip back on. Lost production, the margin on it, and an extended-period-of-restoration tail measured in months routinely exceed the physical damage. Carriers contest BI harder than anything else.
Contamination and corrosive residue
Smoke, soot, and chemical byproducts are corrosive. They migrate through HVAC and settle on equipment and surfaces well outside the fire zone, where the damage is latent. Underscoping here is routine because the harm is not visible on day one.
Code and regulatory upgrade
Heavily regulated facilities rarely rebuild to the old standard. Current code, environmental, and safety requirements drive real rebuild cost above the as-was figure, and ordinance-or-law coverage has to be invoked correctly to capture it.
The corrosion does damage the flames never touched.
Combustion at a chemical facility does not just burn, it releases acidic and reactive compounds in the smoke. Those byproducts are corrosive, and they do not stay in the room that burned. They travel on the air, ride the ventilation system, and deposit a film on electrical contacts, machined surfaces, circuit boards, and finished stock in areas that look untouched. Metal begins to pit. Electronics fail weeks later. Inventory is contaminated and cannot be sold.
This is the single most underscoped element of a process-facility claim, because on the day the adjuster walks through, the far rooms look fine. The damage is real but latent, and the carrier's field adjuster typically is not equipped to detect or quantify it. If it is not documented early and correctly, the claim gets scoped to the visible burn and the policyholder eats the rest.
What we do about it
We bring in industrial hygienists - every time, on a loss like this without exception. A hygienist tests and documents what contamination is actually present, where it has migrated, and at what levels, and puts it on the record while the evidence still exists. That is the difference between thinking there is soot damage in the east building and a documented finding the carrier cannot wave away. The carrier's walkthrough captures what is visibly burned; the hygienist's documentation captures what is actually contaminated. Those are almost never the same scope, and the gap between them is real money the policyholder is otherwise entitled to and would never see.
The frame here is simple and it holds all the way through this claim: we document what actually happened. It just consistently turns out to be a great deal larger than what the insurance company's first scope assumed, because their method is built to see the burn, not the contamination.
The lost-production number is usually bigger than the building, and the carrier knows it.
For a continuous-process facility, the income loss while you are down can dwarf the physical damage. Business interruption coverage is meant to pay the profit you would have earned plus the continuing expenses you still owe, across the full period it genuinely takes to restore operations, not the optimistic timeline the carrier would prefer to assume.
This is where carriers push hardest, because there is no single correct BI number, there is a range of defensible ways to calculate it, and the insurer naturally reaches for the method that pays least. They will build one model on an optimistic restoration timeline and a baseline that happens to understate your normal output.
How we push back
We do not hand the carrier one calculation and hope. We model the loss several independent ways - against seasonality, against equipment lead times, against permitting and rebuild timelines, mapped to how your facility actually operates - and then we use those models against each other to find and substantiate the presentation that most accurately captures the full impact. The carrier's single optimistic model is rarely the honest one.
A concrete piece of that: the look-back period. The carrier may favor a multi-year average because a soft year buried in it conveniently drags your baseline down. If a bad year two years ago is not representative of normal operations, a three-year look-back understates the real loss and a shorter window reflects the truth. Which baseline you use can move the number substantially, and it is exactly the kind of thing a policyholder would never know to contest. We do.
None of this is inflation. It is rigor. We build the most accurate picture of what the interruption actually cost you, and on these losses, the accurate picture is consistently and significantly larger than the carrier's first model, because their method is built to compress the timeline and shave the baseline.
of all large-loss fire property damage comes from manufacturing facilities, the single largest category.
Swiss Re, review of 500+ $10M+ large-loss fires (NFPA data, 20 yrs)
estimated annual direct property damage from U.S. industrial and manufacturing structure fires.
NFPA, Fires in U.S. Industrial or Manufacturing Properties
scale of shutdown seen in real petrochemical fire claims - the interruption tail, not the fire, drives the loss.
Documented petrochemical BI recovery, Pillsbury insurance-recovery practice
The shortfalls in these claims are predictable. So is how we fight them.
Large industrial losses are contested on a handful of recurring fronts. None of these mean the carrier is acting in bad faith, it means the policy is complex and the default reading of it favors the insurer unless someone pushes back with documentation. Here is what they try, and what we do about each.
Using the pollution exclusion to deny cleanup
Property policies define pollutants broadly - smoke, soot, fumes, acids, chemicals - and carriers may invoke a pollution exclusion to resist paying for chemical-contamination cleanup after a fire.
Our move: We treat fire-driven contamination as fire damage, document it through the hygienist's findings, and make the carrier defend the exclusion's application to a covered fire rather than letting them assert it as a foregone conclusion.
Paying depreciated value on equipment you elected to replace
On specialized equipment the gap between replacement cost and actual cash value is enormous.
Our move: We document replacement-cost entitlement and the true cost of like-kind custom equipment, including lead times and fabrication, so depreciation is not quietly applied to property you have the right to replace at full cost.
Asserting a coinsurance penalty to cut the payout
If the carrier argues the facility was underinsured against a coinsurance requirement, it can impose a penalty that slashes an otherwise-covered loss.
Our move: We scrutinize how the insured value and property value were calculated, because that math is genuinely disputable and the carrier's version is not the only valid one, and often not the correct one.
Compressing the business-interruption timeline
The shorter the assumed restoration period, the less BI the carrier owes.
Our move: We reconstruct the genuine timeline from equipment lead times, permitting, and the slow ramp a process plant actually requires, and we model the loss multiple ways to substantiate the real period rather than the carrier's optimistic one.
Paying like-for-like and ignoring code-driven rebuild cost
A regulated facility usually cannot legally rebuild to the old spec.
Our move: We identify the code, environmental, and safety upgrades the rebuild actually requires and tie them to ordinance-or-law coverage, so that real cost is captured instead of quietly omitted from the carrier's estimate.
The insurance company's adjuster works for the insurance company.
After a major loss, the carrier sends its own adjuster, and often a forensic accountant and engineering consultants, all retained by the insurer. They are competent and they are not neutral; their job is to resolve the claim on terms favorable to the company that pays them. A public adjuster is the licensed counterweight: we represent the policyholder only, we build and present the claim, and we negotiate the settlement.
On a process-facility loss the asymmetry is the whole problem. The carrier brings specialists. If the policyholder brings a contractor's estimate and hope, the outcome is decided before the negotiation starts. We level the table, document the full loss with the same rigor the carrier's experts bring to minimizing it, and we are compensated as a percentage of what we recover, so our incentive is your number, not theirs.
What happens after you call.
Loss review and policy analysis
We read the actual policy - limits, coinsurance, BI provisions, ordinance-or-law, exclusions - and assess the full scope of the loss before anyone commits to a number.
Document everything, including the latent damage
Structure, equipment, contamination, and contingent damage outside the burn area. We bring in industrial hygienists and the right experts to document corrosion and process-equipment loss the carrier's walkthrough misses, while the evidence still exists.
Build the business-interruption claim, modeled several ways
From real production and financial records: seasonality, lead times, permitting, and the right look-back baseline, modeled independently and used against each other to substantiate the full loss, not the carrier's truncated model.
Present, negotiate, and settle
We present the documented claim, contest the predictable shortfalls, and negotiate the settlement on your behalf through to resolution.
Questions process-facility owners ask
The carrier already sent an adjuster. Why would I need my own?
Their adjuster is retained and paid by the insurer, and on a large industrial loss they are typically backed by forensic accountants and engineers working the same direction. A public adjuster represents only you, and builds and negotiates the claim as your advocate. On a loss this complex, going without your own representation means the only experts in the room work for the other side.
Is the contamination outside the burn area really covered?
Corrosive smoke and soot damage well beyond the fire zone is a real, documentable loss, and it is frequently underscoped because it is not visible immediately. Carriers may also raise a pollution exclusion to resist paying for chemical-contamination cleanup. Whether that exclusion applies is fact-specific and contestable - it is exactly the kind of issue that has to be confronted with documentation rather than accepted at face value.
How is business interruption actually calculated?
BI is built from your real production and financial records, and there is no single correct number - there is a range of defensible methods, and the carrier reaches for the one that pays least. We model the loss several ways (seasonality, equipment lead times, permitting timelines) and use them against each other to substantiate the most accurate picture of the full impact. A key lever is the look-back period: the carrier may favor a multi-year average that buries your normal output under a soft year, and choosing a baseline that actually reflects normal operations can move the number substantially. It is rigor, not inflation, and the rigorous number is consistently larger than the carrier's first model.
What does it cost to hire a public adjuster?
We work on a percentage of the recovery, with no upfront cost. We are only paid if and when you recover, which means our incentive is aligned with maximizing your settlement. Fee specifics are discussed up front before you commit to anything.
The fire was months ago and the claim feels stuck. Is it too late?
Often not. Claims that are open, underpaid, stalled, or partially settled can frequently still be supplemented or reopened, and latent damage that is only now surfacing may be newly documentable. The sooner it is reviewed the better, but a claim already in progress is not a closed door.
Tell us what happened. We will tell you straight whether you have a fight worth having.
No cost, no obligation. The fastest path is the phone - for a major loss, call and talk to a person today. A licensed Texas public insurance adjuster will review the loss with you.
713-369-4300Start a claim review
Tell us what happened. A licensed Texas public adjuster will review the loss with you, and tell you straight whether you have a fight worth having. The review is free.
A major loss is decided in the first moves. Make yours count.
Talk to a public adjuster who works only for you. No upfront cost - we are paid a percentage only if you recover.
713-369-4300Crossroads Insurance Recovery Advocates · TDI License 1924788
Don't take our word for it
- Swiss Re Corporate Solutions: Large fire losses - unlocking the sources of ignition (review of 500+ $10M+ large-loss fires from NFPA data over 20 years)
- National Fire Protection Association (NFPA): Fires in U.S. Industrial or Manufacturing Properties
- IRMI: the property-policy definition of pollutants and the pollution exclusion
- Pillsbury Insurance Recovery & Advisory: property damage and business interruption recoveries